The headline a few days ago was encouraging: “CT gets $400K grant to study improvements to Metro-North lines”. But what’s $400,000 going to tell us that we don’t already know?
October 31, 2020
October 16, 2020
Here’s a possible solution to Connecticut’s transportation and infrastructure problems and the state’s current unemployment woes: a WPA style building project.
You do remember the Works Progress Administration, right? It was FDR’s plan that put millions of unemployed Americans to work building public projects like roads, water mains, firehouses and dams. Look around you and you’ll still see us benefiting from that investment.
But fast-forward 80 years…
Any reader of this column is all too familiar with the need for transportation investment in our state: our 7000 miles of roads and bridges in “poor condition”, the $4.6 billion needed for wastewater treatment not to mention our rusting railroads.
And everyone in Connecticut is aware of the unemployment crisis brought on by COVID: 8.2% of the state’s labor force is out of work, translating to 153,000 people without jobs, most of them now drawing benefits from our rapidly depleting Unemployment Trust Fund. Soon the state may be borrowing from Washington to keep those unemployment checks coming.
Mind you, not every unemployed person in Connecticut is ready for manual labor. It’s not like laid-off bankers can just pick up a shovel and start digging. But those who are young, able and hungry enough could be candidates… or trained to be.
A few years back General Dynamics’ Electric Boat in Groton needed 4000 welders to build submarines so they turned to the local community colleges to help teach them for jobs starting at $16 an hour.
Could a new New Deal be a win-win solution for Connecticut?
State Representative Jonathan Steinberg (D-Westport) and municipal bankruptcy expert Mike Imber from Weston believe a Connecticut WPA would put thousands of people to work savings millions in unemployment checks while tackling our state’s crumbling infrastructure.
They’ve pitched the idea to the Governor’s office but so far haven’t got much of a response.
The labor unions should be big fans of their idea, as new projects would mean work for their members… maybe even at union wages. Best of all, Steinberg and Imber don’t think the idea would need legislative approval or state money. Instead they suggest a P3… a Public Private Partnership.
“There are hundreds of ‘social impact’ investor funds looking to support ideas like this,” says Imber. “There is no lack of capital.” Investors put up the money for the projects while receiving a reasonable return over 20 or 30 years and the project remains under state ownership and control.
But there’s the rub. Who pays the investors and with what money?
Why not the people who benefit from the projects that get built? Water systems could charge customers for more reliable water supplies. And the people who drive over new bridges and repaired roadways could also be charged a bit more. Which brings us to tolls. Yes, tolls.
“No realistic P3 model doesn’t involve tolls,” says Steinberg, long a supporter of user fees on roads and rails. “The legislature has been gun shy about discussing tolls,” he says. “The real question is whether Lamont will be seeking another term as Governor and is willing to invest the next two years fighting this battle (for tolls).”
Will Lamont risk his COVID-inspired high approval ratings to “do the right thing”, tackling unemployment and fix our infrastructure if it means a battle?
Posted with permission of Hearst CT Media
October 05, 2020
When it comes to COVID’s impact on transportation in our state, we are in the eye of the hurricane.
That’s been the theme of my recent virtual talk to various Connecticut’s libraries and civic groups, comparing the calm eye of an intense storm to how we’ve become complacent about our transportation future. We kid ourselves if we think the winds have passed. The worst is yet to come.
Commuters who’ve returned to the rails tell me ridership is slowly coming back but many still fear for their safety on mass transit, and with good reason.
Metro-North has finally put $50 fines into effect for those refusing to wear face masks on its trains. But they’re leaving enforcement to the MTA Police who almost never are seen on Connecticut trains. Anecdotally I’ve heard from many riders who’ve seen non-mask wearing riders and conductors who do nothing to get them to mask up.
We’re talking about public health here. I think anyone who refuses to wear a mask should be kicked off the train.
The back side of the COVID hurricane may see a second wave of infections, but we will certainly feel the effects of six months of financial losses born by the railroad. The MTA’s Chairman Patrick Foye says the agency is facing an “existential challenge”… a $16 billion deficit by 2024.
Without federal help he’s predicting layoffs and service cuts to as little as one train every two hours. Imagine how crowded those trains will be, commuters sitting three abreast among the unmasked.
But on the state level an even greater financial storm is approaching: The Special Transportation Fund (STF) is going bankrupt faster than previously feared.
It is the STF that funds highway and bridge repairs, subsidizes mass transit and keeps transportation moving. But it relies on gasoline and sales tax revenues that have been slammed by the virus, so by mid 2022 it will run out of money… maybe sooner.
And if the STF is in the red, nobody on Wall Street will underwrite any of Connecticut’s new bonds… not for schools or sanitation or housing. Then what do we do?
What really galls me is that nobody is talking about this.
It is an election year (as if you haven’t noticed), but our State lawmakers have disappeared, leaving the governing of the state (by executive order) to Governor Lamont who, by recent polls, is seen as doing a good job.
Some lawmakers have complained that the legislature has been cut out of decision making, but they couldn’t cite which of Lamont’s emergency orders they took issue with.
Aside from their brief summer session when they passed an omnibus police reform package, now receiving criticism after we understand its details, our State Reps and Senators are AWOL.
Oh, they’re campaigning, but not talking about what’s coming in the next session.
Of course they don’t want to tell you now what’s going to be necessary to re-fund the STF: a combination of tolls, new taxes and higher fares. They’ll leave that bad news until after they are re-elected.
That’s why all of us must force their hand. Go to their campaign rallies (fully masked) and upcoming League of Women Voters debates and ask them, on the record, where they stand on tolls and taxes. And if not those remedies, what are their alternatives?
Then we can all cast an informed vote and decide who’s best to help us weather the storm yet to come.
Posted with permission of Hearst CT Media
Last week’s column ( “Why We Love To Hate I-95” ) apparently struck a nerve, generating a lot of comments, some of which I thought I’d share...
First impressions count. If you’re going on a job interview you dress your best, put on a smile and try to be charming. The same rule a...
How would you like a faster ride on Metro-North? Who wouldn’t! How about a 30 min ride from Hartford to New Haven, from New Haven to Stam...
Public transportation is a money-losing proposition. But Connecticut is home to one of the few profitable transit companies in the US. ...