April 28, 2014
I know it may be hard to believe, but I think things are getting better on Metro-North.
Last week I finally met Joseph Giulietti, the new President of Metro-North. I found him to be very smart, quite candid and equipped with a reasonable plan to bring this railroad back to its once-deserved world-class status.
On May 11th a new timetable will become effective, aimed at achieving two goals: safety and reliability. The timetable will mean running trains on-time but still allowing for track and catenary work to keep the railroad in a state of good repair.
At a Commuter Forum in Westport, Giulietti was the first to admit that the railroad was in bad shape, that trains are running slower and later, often with standees. But unlike GM’s Chairman explaining delays in safety recalls and blaming it on “the old GM”, Giulietti is taking ownership of the problems. That’s refreshing.
Yes, trains are not on time (just 76% in February), but that’s because after the last May’s Bridgeport derailment the FRA issued speed restrictions on bridges and curves. The current timetable is, as one commuter put it in our recent survey, “more of a suggestion” than anything else.
So for the past months the railroad has been analyzing the entire timetable, looking at the reasons for every late train and being open to revising everything. The new timetable will rationalize the current running times, adding 2-4 minutes for trains between New Haven and Stamford, but cutting 2-4 minutes for runs from Stamford to GCT.
That means that your 7:35 am train to work, usually arriving this winter at 7:40 or 7:45, may be rescheduled to arrive at 7:40 and, probably, will. This means you can plan your life with reliability and not be wasting time on the platform peering down the track.
The problem of standees on trains will hopefully lessen when people return to a routine commuting cycle and extra railcars will be provided on trains where ridership shows the demand for more seats.
The good news is that with increased reliability, we may also see greater frequency of service… 4 trains an hour in AM peak instead of 3, trains every half-hour off peak. Yes, the run may take a bit longer but you’ll have more options, always knowing the scheduled departure and arrival times will be achieved.
But is the railroad safe? Yes, insist both Giulietti and CDOT Commissioner Jim Redeker. But so too was airline safety / security after 9-11. And our bridges became safer after the collapse of the Mianus River Bridge 30 years ago. Even in the “land of steady habits” we hopefully learn from our mistakes.
We’re now about half-way through Mr. Giulietti’s 100 day plan to get Metro-North back on track. I, for one, am hopeful he will achieve his goals. But on day 100, June 11th, I’ll be checking the scorecard and seeing what he’s achieved versus what was promised.
April 14, 2014
If Metro-North was a student and commuters were its teacher, the railroad’s winter report card would be a D+ and the comment would be “needs to improve”.
As new Metro-North President Joseph Giulietti finishes his second month on the job, he’s making the rounds to meet and listen to commuters. But his 100-Day Plan for bringing the railroad back won’t conclude until mid-June, so I thought that now would be a great time to survey riders and get a baseline of their sentiments against which we can measure any gains in the months ahead.
Our unscientific online survey ran for seven days and got 642 responses. Clearly, those who wanted to opine were probably those with gripes, so take the results with a grain of salt.
Asked to give Metro-North a letter grade based on the past months’ performance, the railroad got an average D+.
Asked if service was getting better, 22% said yes, 31% said it was getting worse and 47% said it was “about the same”.
When asked what their biggest complaints were (respondents could list multiple issues), 88% said it was late or delayed trains, 60% said poor communications when things went wrong, and 59% said it was lack of sufficient seating on trains. Another 30% complained about the train cars’ heating / cooling system (or lack thereof), while others (18%) said there was insufficient station parking and 15% said the stations had poor upkeep.
The survey also asked how commuters reported their gripes. 10% said they never had complaints, 46% said they didn’t complain “because it seemed useless” but 61% said they did complain to conductors or to Metro-North. Of those who did complained almost half of respondents (45%) said their problem was never fixed.
We also asked who commuters thought was to blame for the railroad’s problems. An overwhelming 90% blamed Metro-North management, 48% said they were due to the Dept of Transportation, 35% said it was their state legislature’s fault, 28% said it was because of Metro-North employees, 12% blamed the Federal government, and 9% blamed their fellow commuters.
Our last question was most telling: “Do you feel safe riding Metro-North?” 56% said yes, 15% said no and 29% said they weren’t sure.
We designed the survey to be brief, taking maybe two minutes to answer. But we also gave space for commuters to comment, and 267 of them did, some at great length. Here’s a sampling of their opinions:
Sorry to be so harsh...It is 2014, pseudo-modern, wealthy society and the most laughable public transportation system in any advanced country and metropolitan area.
This service is really shameful for the amount we pay. I've not been on a train in the last six months that arrived on time.
When I moved here 10 years ago you could set your watch by Metro-North. Now the timetable is just a suggestion.
The Danbury line is the orphaned stepchild of the system.
The lack of self control of "irate" commuters does not help the situation. Makes us look bad.
The full results of the survey and all of the comments are available online via links from our website, www.CommuterActionGroup.org
April 01, 2014
We may never know what happened to that Malaysia Airlines 777, but there’s plenty more we should know about flying, even domestically. Here are some little-known truths of aviation as shared by pilots and flight attendants:
Lavatory Doors Don’t Really Lock: They can be opened from the outside by just sliding the “occupied” sign to one side. This isn’t so attendants can catch “mile high club” wannabies, but so they can be sure the lavs are empty on take-off and landing. And those ashtrays in the lavs? Even though smoking has been banned for decades, the FAA still requires them.
Oxygen Masks Can Save Your Life: But only if you get them on fast! In a rapid decompression at 35,000 feet, the oxygen is sucked from your lungs and you have 15 – 30 seconds to get that mask on or die. And the on-board oxygen is only good for 15 minutes, so expect an express ride down to safer altitudes.
Airlines Are Suffering from a Pilot Shortage: New regulations for increased rest time and more experience aviators are making it tough for airlines to keep their cockpits filled. Boeing alone estimates that aviation growth worldwide will create demand for a half-million new pilots. And just like Metro-North, airlines are now losing their most experienced crews to retirement.
Your Pilot May Be Asleep: Actually, that’s a good thing during most of the flight, which can be pretty boring as the auto-pilot runs the plane. And a good nap should make your pilot refreshed for landing. But the FAA is also proposing to test ‘heavy’ pilots for potential sleep disorders so they don’t nod off at a crucial moment.
Keep Your Seatbelt On: Otherwise, unexpected turbulence will see you bounce off the luggage racks like a ping-pong ball. In an incident like that the hysterical screaming is bad enough, so stay belted.
Flight Attendants Aren’t In It for the Glamour: They don’t get paid when they arrive at the airport or when they greet you boarding the plane. For most, their pay starts ticking only at take-off. They travel for a living and have to endure endless abuse for things that are not their fault. For all that, median salary for flight attendants is about $37,000. Food stamps they have to apply for separately.
Planes Are Germ Factories: Most older jets recycle cabin air to conserve fuel, so if one passenger sneezes, everyone’s susceptible to a cold. The air is also dry and the blankets and pillows (if you get them) haven’t been cleaned since the previous use. The same is true of the headphones they pass out. And your seatback tray table? Just imagine whose baby diaper was seated there where you lay out your in-flight snack. Moral to the story: BYO sanitizer!
Don’t Drink the Water: Unless it comes from a bottle, water on planes comes from onboard tanks that are rarely cleaned. At least when they use it to make coffee it’s heated. Again, BYO.
Overall, based on passenger miles, flying is the safest form of transportation in the world. But it’s not without its risks, some of which you can help minimize using common sense.