November 11, 2018
"Getting There" - The Lockbox Question
Perfection is the enemy of good, said Voltaire. Life is a series of compromises and waiting for “perfect” is like standing still. You’ll never get anywhere.
So it is this election season.
The convention and primary season has delivered us a short list of flawed candidates pandering platitudes of perfection to a weary, cynical electorate. It’s enough to make you decide to not vote, lest you encourage and enable this behavior.
But forget about the gubernatorial choices. It’s your State Representative and State Senator that will be crafting the laws, so pay them heed. Those are the races that really count, so in the waning days of the campaign, go to the debates, read the candidates’ platforms, study the issues and editorials.
Ask for specifics, not generalities. If they say they want to improve train service, ask how and paid for with what. The devil’s in the details and I, for one, am tired of vague generalities that get people elected and then see them do nothing.
And don’t forget to turn over your ballot. That’s where the single most important thing you can do to fix transportation will be found: the Lockbox Referendum question.
It will be labeled as “Question One”, a proposed amendment to the state constitution. And if you read it, you’ll see no mention of the word “lockbox”. But that’s what it is about: putting money for transportation in a special place where it can only be spent on that intended purpose… transportation.
Until now the state’s Special Transportation Fund has been a sieve, raided by Democrats and Republicans alike, to balance the state’s budget. This measure would help stop that.
To make it onto the November ballot, Question One was approved on a bipartisan basis by two legislative sessions. By making it a constitutional amendment instead of a law, it will be harder to circumvent, but not impossible.
This Lockbox question is not perfect. It has loopholes. But if it passes, doom on any lawmaker or Governor who tries to avoid voters’ clear intent: to keep money for transportation spent on just that.
The “Vote Yes on Question One” coalition has wide support, especially from commuters who are tired of seeing our state’s bridges crumble and near-constant delays on standing-room-only trains. Even if you don’t ride our trains or buses, you should care about this issue. It’s your tax dollars (gasoline taxes especially) that have been misspent to the tune of $500 million in the past decade.
But suddenly, Republicans are wavering in their support of this Lockbox, though they initially proposed it. They say it’s not good enough, that it should be tighter and have stronger constraints both on funding and spending.
I might agree. But the November ballot question is what it is. It cannot be changed until the next legislative session. If anyone thinks the lockbox should be stronger, make it so… but only after this version is made law.
Question One’s proposal is not perfect. But to reject is to maintain the status quo, leaving transportation funding subject to misappropriation as in decades past. That’s why I’m voting yes on Question One.
Posted with permission of Hearst CT Media