Because this swing-bridge is so old and in such bad shape, it wouldn’t close, severing all train service and forcing replacement bus shuttles incapable of handling the crowds. These are but the most recent problems on this bridge, and they won’t be the last.
Governor
Malloy says this is “outrageous” and is calling for a sit-down with Metro-North. (Wouldn’t
it be great to be a fly on the wall at that bully-session?)
What
the Governor doesn’t admit is that Connecticut is responsible for that bridge,
not the railroad. Any reasonable civil
engineer (and CDOT has many) would have replaced that bridge decades ago.
Instead,
in the last two years alone, Governor Malloy (like Rowland and Rell before him)
diverted millions in Special
Transportation Fund
monies into balancing his budget instead of replacing or repairing old
bridges. It is disingenuous for the
Governor to express outrage at and blame others for a problem he exacerbated,
but hey… that’s politics. Blame everyone
but yourself.
Instead,
the Governor is asking Uncle Sam to use Super Storm Sandy money to pay 75% of
the expected $465 million in replacement cost of that bridge, a six-year
construction project.
But
the old bridge will still be in use until at least 2018 and, doubtless, will
fail again. Each time it won’t close,
rail service will halt.
Why
not keep the bridge closed? Too
logical. The handful of boats that use
that river have historic and legal right-of-way over the 120,000 daily rail
riders. And that includes heating-oil-carrying
barges, not just pleasure craft.
But
this is but one of five railroad bridges in need of replacement. The highly respected Regional Plan Association’s recent
report said it will
cost $2.8 billion to replace those five crossings, four of them in Connecticut,
built in 1904.
Who’s
going to pay all that money? You guessed
it, Connecticut taxpayers! Why, because
we delayed this work for so many decades and, more importantly, because our
state owns the tracks, the bridges, the power lines and signals. Remember, Metro-North owns nothing in
Connecticut.
Back
in 1970 when New Haven RR parent Penn Central went bankrupt and Conrail then got
out of the commuter rail business, the MTA and Metro-North were born. Both NY and Connecticut agreed they would own
the tracks in their respective states while Amtrak went on to own the rest of
the Northeast Corridor. Ownership has its privileges and obligations (costs).
So
here’s a modest proposal: why doesn’t
Connecticut sell the New Haven mainline to Amtrak / Uncle Sam / “The Feds” for
$1 and let them be responsible for fixing those bridges? Remember… Amtrak trains run on those tracks
as well as Metro-North. This railroad is
a national resource worthy of federal spending.
No comments:
Post a Comment