You
think rush hour traffic is bad in Fairfield County on I-95 and the
Merritt? Try driving on I-84 or I-91
into Hartford! That’s why the planned Busway
from New Britain to downtown makes such sense.
Yet,
the project has been widely scorned and almost scuttled by rail advocates and
lawmakers who would rather see rail service than buses. Even though I’m all about trains, this Busway
project makes sense.
But
first, what is a “busway”, you ask? Let
me explain.
A
busway is a dedicated highway just for buses.
In this case, it would run 9.4 miles from downtown Hartford to New
Britain on an old railroad right-of-way.
There would be 11
stations, each with plenty of parking like at a Metro-North station. So rather than be stuck in rush hour traffic
on the interstates, you’d drive to a Busway station and hop aboard for a
high-speed ride to downtown.
For
more distant commuters, at the end of the dedicate bus-only Busway, the bus
would enter the road system and head off into other towns and neighborhoods…
something that rail cannot do… giving you a one-seat ride from home to work.
Bus Rapid Transit
(BRT) has had great success in other cities like Ottawa, Bogota and
Jakarta. In the Canadian capital,
ridership grew so strong on one line that the buses were replaced with
trolleys. But in all the BRT cities, bus
traffic drew riders because it was removed from the congestion of car and
truck-jammed highways and given its own roadway.
So
why the opposition to the New Britain to Hartford project? Two reasons… money and prejudice.
First,
the Busway has gone from $325 million to $600 million in cost. That’s typical for CDOT accounting, so
nothing new here. But I think it’s worth
$600 million, and better to build it now, in this economy, than to wait until
it’s unaffordable. And $460 million of the project is Federal money.
Pull
the plug now on the project and a) the Fed’s will never trust the state with a
new funding application and b) we’ll be missing a once-in-a-lifetime
opportunity.
This
project is visionary. It’s planning for
the future, not fixing the neglect of the past (as we’ve been trying to do for
a decade on Metro-North). It’s an
investment in the Hartford area’s growth and, as I say, can easily be converted
to or supplemented with light rail when traffic warrants.
Why
not build a railroad and skip the bus step?
Too expensive and not as flexible.
And remember, this is coming from a huge rail fan. If a Busway would cost $600 million, light
rail would be easily twice that.
Which
brings us to the second, and more serious, cause of opposition: prejudice.
Nobody likes buses. Trains are
cool. Buses are for losers. People take
Metro-North by choice, preferring it to driving their cars. But most people think of bus riders as
indigents who don’t have cars, and who wants to sit next to one of “them”?
Designers
have tried to make BRT systems look like trains, but the bus-hater prejudice is
hard to overcome. I just wish that the
opponents of this plan would be realistic about the true goals: moving people in large numbers, fast and
safely.
The
Busway achieves those goals. And I
predict it will be a big success and prove its detractors wrong over time.
No comments:
Post a Comment