Commuters: who’s looking out for your interests as you deal with our roads and rails? Good question, eh?
Way back in 1983 when
Metro-North was created, the Connecticut legislature realized that rail riders
need advocate watchdogs, so they created the CT Metro-North Rail Commuter Council,
a body on which I served for 19 years, four as Chairman.
Taking advantage of the recent
heat wave, I was doing a little “spring cleaning” and came across that Council’s
Annual Report from 2007. It was really
discouraging to see that many of the problems with train service that we
identified 16 years ago are still with us:
fare increases, crowding at rush hour, lack of parking at stations, the
crumbling Stamford station garage and the lack of Wi-Fi on trains.
We did have some victories: the
ordering of new M8 cars, expanded service on the branch lines (especially Shore
Line East) and much improved communications by Metro-North with commuters when
there are delays.
Apparently the Malloy
administration found our constant complaining too annoying and tried to stifle
us by legislating the Council out of existence.
With the help of some lawmakers we stopped that muzzling effort and the
Council was reborn as the CT
Commuter Rail Council, ably led by Chairman Jim Gildea.
Once again, the Council’s
advocacy harped on the same themes to little effect, although the Council
should be credited for a 44% increase in service on the Waterbury branch. The
Council has also been a strong advocate of the soon-to-open new Stamford
garage.
But despite the Council’s best
efforts, lawmakers have plowed ahead with further cuts in Shore Line East and
soon-to-be-announced reductions in trains even on the main line. All of the Council’s
crankiness again got under the skin of the Lamont administration and the
Democrats made another effort to suppress the Council’s powers, this time under
the guise of expanding its mandate.
Thus has been born the new CT Public Transportation Council, now representing both rail and bus riders… a near impossible task given the state’s geography and, as in the past, a lack of any funding to do their work.
So yes, the 15 volunteer
commuters who serve on the new Council do so by digging into their own pockets
to pay for a website, Zoom account and their own transportation costs to and
from meetings.
Will this new Council be
anymore effective than the old ones?
Doubtful.
Advocacy Councils such as these
are a great way for pols to gather all the complainers in one place, give them
the illusion of power and influence and get them to prepare reports and studies
which never get read or acted upon.
Just watch in September when
the CDOT holds mandated Service & Fare Equity public hearings on planned
fare hikes and service cuts. The CT
Public Transportation Council will be there, front and center, rallying
justifiably angry commuters. Good for
them.
But it’s all just political
theater: cathartic but ineffective. In
over 25 years of attending such hearings I have never seen “public comment”
change a planned change, especially one baked into the budget.